I like the fact that the site is laid out in a grid format though I don't think it was executed as well as it could have been. The layout on the top half of the homepage feels bulky and unbalanced. Similarly, the 3x3 grid on the bottom of the page listing of all of the sections borders on overwhelming, though I can see how it would be useful for navigation purposes. Once you navigate further into the site, the aesthetics improve (ie- return to the original style).
As a side note, I am a big fan of being able to customize the site and feature the information that I care about. I think a lot of people will utilize this option. It was also interesting to read in the article that a lot of redesign was based on user data CNN collected; I would be interested to learn more about how this data was collected and interpreted.
Overall, some good ideas (such as incorporating more visuals), but not great style.
I absolutely agree with you, Megan, on the note about the top of the homepage. It's just so heavy and it's a punch in the face.
ReplyDeleteBut, like you said, once you get past that, the site works well. I'm glad you feel the same as I do about the redesign!
I agree as well, I think CNN was going for functionality. It makes sense for them to use the red color from its logo but perhaps a tone down or another element would work. Its easy to get around if you get past the initial look.
ReplyDelete